Preference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHranceSCa): A randomised, open-label phase II study

dc.contributor.authorO'Shaughnessy, Joyce
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Susana
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Josefina
dc.contributor.authorFallowfield, Lesley
dc.contributor.authorAuvinen, Päivi
dc.contributor.authorPulido, Catarina
dc.contributor.authorCvetanovic, Ana
dc.contributor.authorWilks, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Leonor
dc.contributor.authorBurotto, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorKlingbiel, Dirk
dc.contributor.authorMesseri, Dimitri
dc.contributor.authorAlexandrou, Ari
dc.contributor.authorTrask, Peter
dc.contributor.authorFredriksson, Judy
dc.contributor.authorMachackova, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorStamatovic, Ljiljana
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-19T15:19:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-16
dc.description.abstractAim The aim of the study was to assess patient preference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (PH FDC SC) in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer in PHranceSCa (NCT03674112). Materials and methods Patients who completed neoadjuvant P + H + chemotherapy + surgery were randomised 1:1 to three intravenous (IV) P + H cycles followed by three cycles of PH FDC SC or vice versa (crossover) and then chose subcutaneous (SC) injection or IV infusion to continue up to 18 cycles (continuation). Assessments were via patient and healthcare professional (HCP) questionnaires. Results One hundred and sixty patients were randomised (cut-off: 24 February 2020); 136 (85.0%, 95% confidence interval: 78.5–90.2%) preferred SC; 22 (13.8%) preferred IV; 2 (1.3%) had no preference. The main reasons for SC preference were reduced clinic time (n = 119) and comfort during administration (n = 73). One hundred and forty-one patients (88.1%) were very satisfied/satisfied with SC injection versus 108 (67.5%) with IV infusion; 86.9% chose PH FDC SC continuation. HCP perceptions of median patient treatment room time ranged from 33.0–50.0 min with SC and 130.0–300.0 min with IV. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1/2 (no 4/5s); serious AE rates were low. AE rates before and after switching were similar (cycles 1–3 IV → cycles 4–6 SC: 77.5% → 72.5%; cycles 1–3 SC → cycles 4–6 IV: 77.5% → 63.8%). Conclusion Most patients strongly preferred PH FDC SC over P + H IV. PH FDC SC was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals (even when switching), and offers a quicker alternative to IV infusion.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.047
dc.identifier.urihttps://cancer.senacyt.gob.pa/handle/123456789/144
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEuropean Journal of Cancer
dc.relation.ispartofseries152
dc.subjectPertuzumab
dc.subjectTrastuzumab
dc.subjectEarly breast cancer
dc.subjectAdjuvant
dc.subjectSubcutaneous
dc.subjectFixed dose
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcomes
dc.subjectPatient preference
dc.subjectHealthcare resource
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.titlePreference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHranceSCa): A randomised, open-label phase II study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PIIS0959804921002148.cleaned.pdf
Size:
708.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: